Ranomics
Protein structure confidence heatmap showing layered validation from multiple prediction models
Structure prediction

Structural validation for protein binder design

Every designed binder candidate is validated by structure prediction before advancing to synthesis. Boltz-2, ESMFold, and ColabFold filter candidates that fail to fold correctly or engage the target as intended.

Validation tools

Three models, layered validation

First pass

ESMFold

Single-sequence structure prediction using a protein language model. No multiple sequence alignment required, making it fast enough to screen thousands of designed sequences as an initial fold quality check.

Speed

Seconds per sequence. Screens the full design pool rapidly.

Role

First-pass filter. Removes sequences that are predicted to misfold before running more expensive complex prediction.

Complex validation

Boltz-2

Structure prediction model for validating designed binder-target complexes. Predicts the three-dimensional structure of the binder in complex with the target and scores the predicted interface quality.

Metrics

ipTM, interface pLDDT, and PAE at the binding interface. All three must pass thresholds.

Role

Primary complex validator. Confirms that the designed binder engages the target at the intended epitope with correct geometry.

Orthogonal check

ColabFold (AlphaFold2)

Accelerated AlphaFold2 for complex structure prediction. Provides an independent validation check using a different model architecture, reducing the risk of model-specific false positives from Boltz-2 alone.

Metrics

Same confidence framework: pLDDT, PAE, ipTM. Cross-referenced against Boltz-2 predictions.

Role

Orthogonal validator. Candidates that pass both Boltz-2 and ColabFold have higher confidence of correct fold and interface geometry.

Confidence metrics

How we interpret predictions

pLDDT

Per-residue confidence score (0-100). Regions above 70 are generally reliable. Below 50 indicates disorder or low-confidence prediction.

PAE

Predicted aligned error between residue pairs. Low PAE between binder and target indicates high confidence in their relative positioning at the interface.

ipTM

Interface predicted TM-score. Measures the quality of the predicted complex interface. The primary metric for assessing whether a designed binder engages the target correctly.

Target preparation

When your target lacks a crystal structure

Many client targets do not have experimental crystal structures in the PDB. AlphaFold2 models serve as the structural input for design campaigns, provided the binding region has high confidence (pLDDT >70, low inter-domain PAE).

We assess model quality before accepting it as a design input. Low-confidence regions at the proposed binding site are flagged, and we recommend experimental structure determination if the model is unreliable at the epitope.

Have a target sequence but no crystal structure?

We accept AlphaFold models as design inputs with appropriate confidence assessment. Send us your target and we will evaluate feasibility.

Start a project →